So more about the regard of debate -- interesting that it's coming back into prominence. So go and have a nice demolish the idea of physical Agora public space. There is a kind of art that takes public as its subject without necessarily exposing yourself to the weather. It is somewhere where I put some of my ideas -- public, but which public? Especially in the light of the means of dissemination -- he rightly points out that the media has always been a public. In work which purposely caused controversy, the media not only disseminates balsa performs work.
And other coming completely intertwined with the media and TV, is that not truly public -- since that is the shared portal to a space activities are discussed and debated. E.g. Dan Graham buying space in the specialist publication -- but by courting the tabloids which is the mass media to reach is much wider. So the thing about public event to discuss an activity not set spaces.
Which is what I was trying to get out with when I was thinking about the public screens are not public just because they're in a public space what is it that they doing most of the time just advertising things.
But also events or discussion places which uphold the status quo -- do they actually add anything to the wider debate? Something I actually do need to tackle in my compression pieces -- again ways of averaging ways of summarising to an objective process. And the ones in particular are the archive that is growing at a steady pace of artist talks and critics talks and overcoming a kind of working themselves but the latter artwork because there is work about work only be seen to make that metalwork back into the work.
So when something enters the mass media it becomes public -- as in newspapers or studio think it's worth following. Antagonisms perhaps replacing dialogue is the grand public art -- at least it's better buying more involved with and in touch with the actual communities intense effect will be entitled to. Public sphere is accessible to discursive run or one riven with inequality in conflict? By the transient public art seems to be the way forward -- at least people are not stuck with it, so even if there is disagreement is not long-term. Which is kind of what I was suggesting with public screens -- being a type of public video arts if there developed in that way -- by having the added bonus of being intrinsically changeable. Mark Wilsher says "it is unchallenging sin needs to be in order to be granted permanent by the Gardens of traditional culture" to which I would add -- it has to appeal to the board of public -- the average man.
So what is the public must? One that looks at how people interact in public and in public places. One explores how things are disseminated beyond the artist -- these are gay cock that get passed on through public channels such as the media and the Internet. One that draws on the public as participants, but not necessarily in a dialogic relationship -- when the and the am thinking about this the onscreen -- it's a way of accessing the public with our selection, without them having a choice in the script so they're participating without really having any input. And it's tautological since the participants are drawn from the very sphere which feeds into reality TV titles of the script.
Then with searching, these are also public in the sense of where they originated -- but if they display phones. You have to consider if they put an electronics store -- then they fit in what far more? Or estate agent? It's something I need to explore further from doing it the other day that praying that he be like that small one into something like Sainsbury's then it doesn't fit in, it obviously doesn't fit in and yet people still ignoring.
Another thing I thought was that maybe if it was talking them with those of voice that will draw people in more because that's that's more unusual in a public place or in a supermarket. Or maybe the whole point is that it takes publicness as its subject doesn't actually need to then go into the public can stand alone as something that is created by the public, in terms of their the public being the Internet all again the average input into the Internet being a sort of public. Does it actually need to enter into the public sphere as being new to go over as in a public place or space for differences in May. Could it not be a book or something.
No comments:
Post a Comment