no. 5 (secret vehicle propaganda)

Okay time I start again as the computer seems to be getting a bit confused. What I'm saying, is the idea of a public took me back to my interest in the average and what that means- how it's worked out, if you think about the common ground between meetings the most access to figure the average ground. If you take all the different people in society and political beliefs divided by the number of people you have the kind of middle ground that the most commonly occurring thing I eat the average.

Now we're going to be a public space you are not in the same way. If this is the average in politics, in its present on the far right or far left the same criticisms as public as the European two or three times fees the largest number of people.

If the average San Clemente think about such a case through trial three times across the average asked why many public office becomes less often more, something else because I can't reach out to me I can't imagine many sign up to the benefits if it's not effective. If it's kind of few groups criticizing this month and other make it to function in a funny way of implanting the regeneration system.

So, interesting to think that the public generally get it has to be nonpolitical because again that would divide people in custody unoffensive. Again that would divide and alienate people, any one in society sinusitis varies kind of patent appeals that average opinion and average levels of what would consult with and what would have sustained middle ground. That wouldn't be commissioned so by its very nature that you wouldn't get something commissioned that was illegal with him, and no I will not. So Rosa and three will send him this idea in all the probably report across is very related to the idea of public screens because public screens are basically more confronted than just a little-known trust but they are full of public video.

So where an apostle had static things by the nature of sculptures in your holes, now technology allows that there can be public video screens so this can then foster a new age of public laws, which is moving image therefore changeable- don’t get stuck with the same thing for ages.
But it still has the same problems of content- what videos can you put in them plan to appeal to wide range people, not alienate them and at the same time possibly regeneration area. Especially obvious would be things like community PDAs, things could use within that community, but then one area can contain many different communities so still some things can be alienated, and again I can imagine that you would probably get this false something so you would be sharing the positive side of the community.

And video also even more potential than other forms of all I think to be used towards of text and voice, which can give the message across very clearly all people very assiduously in a way that may be a sculpture can't. Even though there can be many different readings for sculptor identity secret vehicle propaganda.

The other thing I was thinking was interactive and screen based works and how they could be seen as kind of island free, not TV viewer and empowering them, in the sense that they become active participants as opposed to just viewers. And the idea is that this challenge is the normal model of received the brother transmits a message receiver, which is the way that generally media has left from TV to radio, so that the idea that they work against that principle by having the two-way receivership. Old two-way input under that makes a difference in terms of the participants’ kind of involvement and by extension in society.
With the logical conclusion being that if the more the consumer/viewer becomes empowered into creating content and be able to see that content disseminated to these projected into public skip, the space in some way that is a more democratic principle because brother the people on top, all the media being very once transmitting messages, the message is coming from the other direction as well formed the public into the public on.

So the argument being that back is a more democratic principle that just watching something bigger, and much the same argument has been used in the incident, that the consumer overview has become the producers while the producer of content, which should suggest a way of moving towards a more egalitarian society. Content is provided from different places rather than off brother and children down or being projected from on high from one centralized place.