no.7 (you owe your feet)

So in their habit of breaking the things I was working on now doesn't get them done personality contest just need to rewrite the last line to go with the Speaking days. I've recorded today. Also the dream home how far can you explain that one! Then after tie-up is a sweet 16 -- are actually am I kidding myself by the amount working well.
Anyway in the first instance it really is just rubbish like text is just I wonder if I should stick with the original, more challenging premise, of recruiting people over the Internet -- alert the idea of having no control over casting filming etc so that everything apart the script is not controlled by me.

Meanwhile I've also been looking at doing the dream home on from the plenty of the second person which changed quite a lot with list in the first person getting so much like a diary or just telling a story. By using the second person of this constraint that comes in so that I can person point of view is interesting for a number of reasons to me and I just realised that my life thinks it is what it is second person.
Which I never realised before I just looked up on Amazon on, and sure enough it's written in second person to responsible. Reading about on the Internet anyway what they say that it is usually used in instructional writing, self-help, marketing, informational writing -- so basically we're in when giving commands to the reader. Maybe command their cellular instructions and that's why self-help and personal quote fit into that category.

The other dimensionless interactive fiction you know the ones where you get to choose what happens next and then where the characters going and so on and do a balancing scintilla videogames will be giving commands like you must do this you are going to see this or that person.
So this is also this is weakness as well as its strength is that you're encouraging the reader to think the protagonist not as a separate person, but as themselves so to identify completely with the character being presented to them. Apparently it stood firm "gathering -- the -- reader" and is using almost all self-help and personal growth and how to articles which makes sense.
And so in a way that I won't use it though what's happening? I think what would happen is that all and another thing -- it was saying that you should never confuse your first person or rather your second person in your third person -- so, you should never have things who likes the same human doing this and that and then going he and she because it confuses the reader. But this confusion is exactly what I'm interested in - how can you make the writing scholar holding on itself or contradict itself.
For example if you say you owe your feet you think of so great that could be an internal monologue of the person but at the same time it has been presented as you are doing base and you don't know feels most identified with the goods on the knee the eye of the piece, all the other person is in the picture. So it's fairly clear when there's just one person, because if you saying you and then you see one person is a little about them, words when there is more then one person picture and using the uniform there are few or the reader doesn't know who you're referring to.

So the internal monologue could then the companies directed outwards to one of the other characters all it could be that one of the other characters has now become central character. I think I investigated its all coming from one person's point of view who is the main personal essay in the pictures. Although that's not always the case because in some of the person is matching the picture and the writing is more of a reflection of how they're feeling about the other people. But also highlight this intersection of kind affirmations or how to you instructions of how to do things and how to live and then but that they can have their coming out really negative instead of being positive and then being affirmative before an affirmation is becoming our negative light on what would be what's the opposite of affirmative negative negativism is in an.

If you've got these the languages both expressing what the character thinks and try to give them instructions on what they should do but then the uniform, can also become a type of insult, for example if you say things like you already own it, "you think you're all that", you shouldn't be doing that I don't know, like that which is more is clearly instructional is not saying you're going to do this is you are such a different.
So now and then I will go out looking back over it all in the second row from and maybe adding to the public, but keeping my mind that it is easy marketing easy to sell things, because it's it you in and says it alienates the reader or viewer is both.
The other thing is how that connects to images- stock photography photos- which are kind of neutral don't really say anything about the characters but at the same time they used to sell things, so that in that same kind of racket as those, this could be you, this is attainable if you buy this essentially black wife sizing.

I Bleed

Final Sleep

no.6 (socks to redraw pillow on his hands)

So the most orbital in period and the only way doing -- keywords -- without linking together. There are three simple present and don't use EZ Norcros will yield down Tony's. I mean it should be second person in an ever present, seen from the outside in neutral way -- fetches objective -- serve to seem present year. I diligently intimate the sale will see lagoon is to be clear keywords have to cover different aspects of people's last claims to motion with things as that can have caught my attention.

There was this thing that do not editorialise when you're writing keywords and captains because it has to be neutral, how to become pointedly that it could be anybody and it could be used in various situations. Going to die to alerting then you're saying I think there's more backwards in this anyway period. So it made me think of there being all certain types of bar where there is no editorialising or very little and the idea is that taking this kind of neutral stance is less expressive maybe or the role of the author is less deterministic, left-wing things in this kind of really clear and organised a home order whereby new author has got complete power over how it happens.

The obvious time pressure he was saying was one really think of was the Philippines where she all for pushing the same depth, she didn't want to editorialise, she didn't want to put things in any particular order because maybe that was kind of print to authoritarian data style, workwear would bring too much emphasis on the producer or the author's point of view, and what the goods and manipulative about it rather than allow the audience will view it confident conclusions and away.

So stock photography same thing- should not editorialise things, should be neutral with different point of view of things, like a woman, 25, white sitting on a chair but don't go into much detail so if you start saying things like socks to redraw pillow on his hands, years knows then I'll miss the point. I really liked this idea of these lists, things are definitely things that somewhere in the lists -- I'm not pronounced example I am just listing what you see in image.

Then I thought about that with the pictures and it just seemed a bit too obvious. Like in the centre in wedding where the tension between the 2 mean I started looking at doing ones which could describe in August- or was there then and since coming to office to me, however, what I think is simply a mass in something else.
Slot in the same year your work should be eating with some loose ends you to work with menaces and you send me to pick up on the idea of using keywords but without an image- so that I don't know how you present it, perhaps by just listing them use the words would make a funny film.

One Step Forward

Beautiful Death

Lyrics by MacSpeech Dictate trained to recognise my voice.

no. 5 (secret vehicle propaganda)

Okay time I start again as the computer seems to be getting a bit confused. What I'm saying, is the idea of a public took me back to my interest in the average and what that means- how it's worked out, if you think about the common ground between meetings the most access to figure the average ground. If you take all the different people in society and political beliefs divided by the number of people you have the kind of middle ground that the most commonly occurring thing I eat the average.

Now we're going to be a public space you are not in the same way. If this is the average in politics, in its present on the far right or far left the same criticisms as public as the European two or three times fees the largest number of people.

If the average San Clemente think about such a case through trial three times across the average asked why many public office becomes less often more, something else because I can't reach out to me I can't imagine many sign up to the benefits if it's not effective. If it's kind of few groups criticizing this month and other make it to function in a funny way of implanting the regeneration system.

So, interesting to think that the public generally get it has to be nonpolitical because again that would divide people in custody unoffensive. Again that would divide and alienate people, any one in society sinusitis varies kind of patent appeals that average opinion and average levels of what would consult with and what would have sustained middle ground. That wouldn't be commissioned so by its very nature that you wouldn't get something commissioned that was illegal with him, and no I will not. So Rosa and three will send him this idea in all the probably report across is very related to the idea of public screens because public screens are basically more confronted than just a little-known trust but they are full of public video.

So where an apostle had static things by the nature of sculptures in your holes, now technology allows that there can be public video screens so this can then foster a new age of public laws, which is moving image therefore changeable- don’t get stuck with the same thing for ages.
But it still has the same problems of content- what videos can you put in them plan to appeal to wide range people, not alienate them and at the same time possibly regeneration area. Especially obvious would be things like community PDAs, things could use within that community, but then one area can contain many different communities so still some things can be alienated, and again I can imagine that you would probably get this false something so you would be sharing the positive side of the community.

And video also even more potential than other forms of all I think to be used towards of text and voice, which can give the message across very clearly all people very assiduously in a way that may be a sculpture can't. Even though there can be many different readings for sculptor identity secret vehicle propaganda.

The other thing I was thinking was interactive and screen based works and how they could be seen as kind of island free, not TV viewer and empowering them, in the sense that they become active participants as opposed to just viewers. And the idea is that this challenge is the normal model of received the brother transmits a message receiver, which is the way that generally media has left from TV to radio, so that the idea that they work against that principle by having the two-way receivership. Old two-way input under that makes a difference in terms of the participants’ kind of involvement and by extension in society.
With the logical conclusion being that if the more the consumer/viewer becomes empowered into creating content and be able to see that content disseminated to these projected into public skip, the space in some way that is a more democratic principle because brother the people on top, all the media being very once transmitting messages, the message is coming from the other direction as well formed the public into the public on.

So the argument being that back is a more democratic principle that just watching something bigger, and much the same argument has been used in the incident, that the consumer overview has become the producers while the producer of content, which should suggest a way of moving towards a more egalitarian society. Content is provided from different places rather than off brother and children down or being projected from on high from one centralized place.

no. 4

Well pleased, well decided in and we had about Hutton is to use the out-in cats and Chinese cats and only one could do it in. Longer tried it anyway we don't cut between D, but one character talking to the cats and then withdraw the cats, they almost would be like a judging panel and also attacked the symbols of success as well server.

And is very finger about peace in works on something about it I don't like end this installment, via giving this some real college this Mr real, or element to it and also developing a B. Good talking to something not responding that truly, essentially just talking to yourself - but are looking for answers in something inanimate which stricken dumbly than waiting its hand you are denied like the idea that said under travel ads.

no.3 (backups make sense to itself)

Is watch personality contest Indonesia or near a bit about leading people and also the Central was also as to Australia act that reflects speeding up the and living authentic to force a sense of using other peoples in language- more is it I don't like about it if it is to fake?
Supposed to have something to do with the way we performed to screen how can that be real anyway? It also, in its mode of production, comment on public space, and in a way, public screens, since using the screen as a mirror to talk towards and also recording device -- the collapsing of distinctions between types of technology -- it's filmed using Photo Booth, which is basically a type of vanity projects where you interact with the screen as Mirror.

Maybe there's something too clear about it -- or too close. As men was saying with ghost story, the fact it could be anyone, and not me in particular made it more interesting as it doesn't exclude the other meanings anyhow -- wanted to type too much autobiographical realities or facts is not necessary more interesting.
But then the personality contest, it's that is the whole cognitive behavioural therapy in action -- as if you could analyse yourself mom and then on the basis of that self-analysis, improve yourself -- calibration and measurement of psychological outlook meaning it can be bettered.
And the connection between this and where artists had to deal with failure, and with having to start reflect -- tries in the reflection of the screen it is making, and also in its form as this reflection of the two characters, who are one and the same.
The final point being the culmination of self-analysis fails could the characters keep contradicting themselves -- in fact wrong in that assessment subtle you do not and also of why people do these tests -- what insights the radiant, or is all the points that you get to share results -- other see what you make of itself.

On the question of the desire for public displays of intimacy -- solicitation of people to get close to you, which I see as a parallel with the idea of the distance between artwork and viewer, which went from being separate things in modernism to the idea that the artwork actually solicits to be as attention -- maybe to work becoming attention-seeking and collapsing the boundary between itself and the other.

Also a third if the whole moment public intimacy under question why the little technology allows us ways of being intimate in public? It is vital we don't have to do it face to face, that will have no response, or the opportunist eight or more real, it becomes an authentic experience it has been ordered in a public or potentially public place? Does it give a semblance of control of your existence? There are two characters try to pin down what is there about backups make sense to itself.